Yves here. This short Dean Baker post says even more than he intends. Why has there not been more uproar about the jokes masquerading as administrators that Trump has installed in the Cabinet and other top posts? Because, as we and others (particularly Aurelien) basic managerial “put one foot in front of the other” skills have been catastrophic decline over the last two decades. I am stunned to now look somewhat charitably upon the likes of Hank Paulson, Timothy Geithner, and Ben Bernanke in the runup to and after the financial crisis. Even though they flailed about and sought only to address proximate problems so as to preserve a rotting status quo, they did so with some appreciation of what they were up against and so eventually were able to stumble their way through to an end-state that worked for them. We have nothing like even that limited level of skill operating anywhere at senior levels.
And why has that become acceptable? The only thing I can fathom is fear in the ranks of the press and the business community. I recall having readers say during Brexit that the business community held back from expressing their considerable, fact-based reservations about the way Brexit was evolving into the hardest form possible out of fear of retaliation by the Government. The press has also become cowardly. The Conversation has a new article, ABC’s and CBS’s settlements with Trump are a dangerous step toward the commander in chief becoming the editor-in-chief, which details how both networks capitulated to Trump suits when the odds of them prevailing in court was very high. The piece also points out how past Presidents tried to muscle the media and got less far. A lesson here is that the press is more than ever run like a business and not with a sense of editorial mission, which would result in relishing fights with power where the publisher has a winning case. The press that published the Pentagon Papers is long dead. And that is a big driver in the rise and continued failing upward of abject mediocrities like Keir Starmer and Kamala Harris. The Trump team does represent a ratchet down, but it’s on an established trajectory.
And as readers will also appreciate, “People will die” is a feature, not a bug, per Lambert’s second rule of neoliberalism.
By Dean Baker, the co-founder and the senior economist of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). He is the author of several books, including “Getting Back to Full Employment: A Better bargain for Working People,” “The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive,” “The United States Since 1980,” “Social Security: The Phony Crisis” (with Mark Weisbrot), and “The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer.” Originally published at Beat the Press; cross posted from Common Dreams
We all know and expect that a president’s top appointees are picked in large part because of their willingness to carry out a president’s agenda. But usually these are people with some experience in the areas that they are overseeing. Insofar as this is not the case, they can generally rely on the high-level career officials in the departments or agencies under their control to make sure that necessary tasks get accomplished.
Unfortunately, this is not the case now. The main and possibly only qualification for Trump’s top appointees is the ability to tell blatant lies with a straight face. He has picked people who not only have no background in the areas they oversee, they don’t even have the most basic understanding of their responsibilities. And in many cases they have fired or marginalized the career people with expertise.
Starting at the top, Trump picked a former Fox talk show host with a drinking problem, Pete Hegseth, to be his Secretary of Defense. Secretary Hegseth apparently didn’t know that he shouldn’t be making war plans on unsecured channels and without knowing who was included in the conversations. He apparently also didn’t know that his wife should not be included in the discussions.
Hundreds of people just died in Texas because of this failure, and we are virtually certain to see far worse in the future.
Trump has a Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, who claims he doesn’t know that tariffs (import taxes) are taxes. Since tariffs are among the oldest form of taxes, long predating the income tax, this is a pretty elementary point that a Treasury Secretary would be expected to know.
Kristi Noem, Trump’s Homeland Security Secretary, didn’t know what habeas corpus is. Since that is basic right guaranteed by the Constitution, it would be rather important for the person controlling the largest federal police force to be familiar with the concept.
While knowledge of their areas may not be a strong point for top Trump officials, lying in front of TV cameras is an area of real expertise. We see this constantly.
We just saw Attorney General Pam Bondi tell us that there is no Jeffrey Epstein client list. This was after telling us back in February that the list was sitting on her desk and promising that it was soon to be released.
After Trump released his “Liberation Day” tariffs, which included a steep tariff on the uninhabited Heard and McDonald Islands, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick insisted this was not a mistake and an indication of a rushed job. Instead, he said the tariffs were necessary to prevent transshipment from other countries to escape the taxes Trump was imposing.
This is obviously an absurd claim since there were many uninhabited islands that escaped taxation. In addition, while the problem of transshipment to avoid tariffs is real, it is not one that can be solved by putting a tariff on imports from islands inhabited by penguins and seals.
China and other countries whose exports are subject to high tariffs can and will ship them through countries that face much lower import taxes. If our customs agents can’t recognize that we are not actually importing cars and television sets from uninhabited islands, they surely will not be able to detect that the goods coming from Thailand or Indonesia were actually manufactured in China.
Trump appointees do have a remarkable ability to lie. RFK Jr. can tell us that discouraging people from getting the measles vaccines has nothing to do with the largest measles outbreak in decades. They all tell us that we can reduce Medicaid spending by $800 billion over the decade (roughly 10 percent), without throwing anyone off the program. And former DOGE boss Elon Musk told us 20 million dead people were getting Social Security benefits.
But it seems that none of them can do their jobs, and since they have fired or sidelined most of the high- level civil servants with expertise, these jobs are not getting done. Hundreds of people just died in Texas because of this failure, and we are virtually certain to see far worse in the future. As much as Trump might insist otherwise, incompetence is not a virtue.
