\n<\/p>\n
A Florida judge on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit<\/a> filed against embattled HR and payroll provider Deel. And while Deel described this<\/a> as a \u201cRippling-aligned\u201d and \u201cRippling-supported\u201d lawsuit, this is not the infamous lawsuit filed by its rival earlier this year that involved an alleged corporate spy.<\/p>\n Rippling CEO Parker Conrad even went so far as to write \u201cThis litigation has nothing to do with Rippling, we are not a party to it, did not fund it,\u201d in a tweet<\/a>. (Rippling representatives declined further comment.)<\/p>\n Still, this is some good news for Deel. In January, a lawsuit was filed in Florida by Melanie Damian, who accused Deel of helping Russian entities sidestep U.S. sanctions by processing payments for Surge Capital Ventures.<\/p>\n Surge had been subject to a separate U.S. SEC action<\/a> alleging that the company was involved in a Ponzi scheme that defrauded church members out of $35 million. Damian, a court-appointed receiver for Surge, was tasked with recovering assets, Semafor reported<\/a> at the time. She filed the lawsuit on behalf of investors, alleging that Deel was responsible for processing the payments. This is the case that was dismissed.<\/p>\n Deel is attempting to tie this case to the suit filed by Rippling, in part because Damian\u2019s lawyers cited the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).<\/p>\n Rippling, which is suing Deel in California, is also alleging that Deel violated RICO, as well as the Defend Trade Secrets Act, and California state law, as TechCrunch previously reported.<\/a> RICO is famously the statute that was originally used to prosecute mobsters.<\/a><\/p>\n Rippling\u2019s lawsuit, however, involves a different set of allegations centered on a Rippling employee who testified in an Irish court <\/a>that he had been acting as a paid corporate spy for Deel.\u00a0<\/p>\n Techcrunch event<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSan Francisco<\/span> Deel is clearly hoping that if one court dismisses a lawsuit alleging RICO violations, another court will follow suit. \u201cThe ruling invites further questions about the credibility of another baseless set of RICO accusations by Rippling in California,\u201d a Deel spokesperson told TechCrunch in an emailed statement.\u00a0<\/p>\n But as these cases involve different actions and circumstances, we\u2019ll all have to wait and see how the California court responds. Meanwhile, Deel is also suing Rippling,<\/a> claiming that one of Rippling\u2019s employees was unlawfully impersonating a customer.<\/p>\n On top of all of that, the person who confessed to being Deel\u2019s alleged corporate spy, Keith O\u2019Brien, successfully obtained a restraining order against people<\/a> he said were following him and scaring his family. O\u2019Brien is now Rippling\u2019s star witness in its case against Deel.\u00a0<\/p>\n At first, lawyers for Deel denied involvement, but later admitted the company had hired \u201cdiscreet surveillance\u201d of O\u2019Brien, according to court testimony seen by TechCrunch and first reported by the Irish Independent.<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cAlex and his father can deflect and delay but they will face the music when we get our day in court,\u201d Conrad added in his tweet, referring to Rippling\u2019s case that names Deel\u2019s founder and CEO Alex Bouaziz and his father, who is chairman and CFO, Philippe Bouaziz.<\/p>\n \u201cDeel will explore all its options for relief, defend itself vigorously against pending cases and continue to focus on winning in the marketplace,\u201d a Deel spokesperson said in that statement.<\/p>\n We\u2019re always looking to evolve, and by providing some insight into your perspective and feedback into TechCrunch and our coverage and events, you can help us! Fill out\u00a0<\/em>this survey<\/a><\/em>\u00a0to let us know how we\u2019re doing and get the chance to win a prize in return!<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t|<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tOctober 27-29, 2025<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n