\n<\/p>\n
Do A.I. chatbots packaged inside cute-looking plushies offer a viable alternative to screen time for kids?<\/p>\n
That\u2019s how the companies selling these A.I.-powered kiddie companions are marketing them, but The New York Times\u2019 Amanda Hess has some reservations<\/a>. She recounts a demonstration in which Grem, one of the offerings from startup Curio, tried to bond with her. (Curio also sells a plushie named Grok, with no apparent connection to the Elon Musk-owned chatbot<\/a>.)<\/p>\n Hess writes that this is when she knew, \u201cI would not be introducing Grem to my own children.\u201d As she talked to the chatbot, she became convinced it was \u201cless an upgrade to the lifeless teddy bear\u201d and instead \u201cmore like a replacement for me.\u201d<\/p>\n She also argues that while these talking toys might keep kids away from a tablet or TV screen, what they\u2019re really communicating is that \u201cthe natural endpoint for [children\u2019s] curiosity lies inside their phones.\u201d<\/p>\n Hess reports that she did, eventually, let her kids play with Grem \u2014 but only after she\u2019d removed and hidden the voice box. They still talked to it and played games with it; then they were ready for some TV.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n