Privacy-focused messaging app Signal<\/a> has been flying high in the Dutch app stores this past month, often sitting at the top as the most downloaded free app on iOS and Android across all categories, per data from multiple app-tracking platforms such as Sensor Tower<\/a>.<\/p>\n The app has experienced surges in popularity over the years, often in response to policy changes at rivals like WhatsApp<\/a> or geopolitical events<\/a>. That\u2019s because Signal has made a name for itself as a more privacy-friendly option \u2014 it\u2019s operated by a not-for-profit foundation (albeit one based in the U.S.) rather than a private business focused on monetizing data. Moreover, Signal tracks minimal metadata.<\/p>\n In 2025, with a new U.S. president empowered by Big Tech\u2019s warm embrace, it\u2019s not surprising that digital privacy tools are having a moment \u2014 particularly in Europe, which has attracted President Trump\u2019s ire<\/a>.<\/p>\n But what\u2019s especially eye-catching this time around is Signal\u2019s prominence in one very specific locale \u2014 the Netherlands.<\/p>\n In an interview with<\/a> Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf last week, Signal President Meredith Whittaker<\/a> noted that the number of \u201cnew registrations\u201d in the Netherlands was higher this year by a factor of 25, though it\u2019s not clear what the exact comparative period of time is for this data.<\/p>\n When asked why the Netherlands has seen such growth, Whittaker pointed to a combination of factors: \u201cGrowing awareness of privacy, distrust of big tech, and the political reality in which people realize how vulnerable digital communication can be,\u201d Whittaker said.<\/p>\n Data provided to TechCrunch from app intelligence firm AppFigures<\/a> charts Signal\u2019s rise in the Netherlands. Per its data, Signal ranked 365th among non-game iPhone apps in the Netherlands on January 1 and did not appear in the top overall apps list. Then, starting around January 5, it began to climb the rankings, reaching the top position by February 2.<\/p>\n Signal has dipped in and out of the lead in the intervening weeks, spending around half of February at the summit \u2014 including each day since February 22. Digging deeper into the data, AppFigures estimates that combined downloads across Apple and Google\u2019s app stores totaled around 22,000 in December 2024. This jumped to 99,000 in January and soared to 233,000 through February \u2014 a 958% rise since December.<\/p>\n While some of this growth may be attributed to Signal having lower saturation than in other markets, the app\u2019s sustained position at the top compared to similar-sized neighboring markets is notable.<\/p>\n \u201cNo other markets come close to the Netherlands in terms of growth between December and February,\u201d AppFigures told TechCrunch.<\/p>\n For comparison, since December, Belgium has seen downloads grow by more than 250%, Sweden by 153%, and Denmark by 95%.<\/p>\n So why might Signal be experiencing what one Redditor called a \u201cmass adoption moment<\/a>\u201d in the Netherlands?<\/p>\n Rejo Zenger<\/a>, senior policy advisor at Dutch digital rights foundation Bits of Freedom<\/a>, said that while it\u2019s difficult to pinpoint one specific reason, he\u2019s not surprised.<\/p>\n Recent developments in the U.S. have seen the big platform providers<\/a> align with the new Trump administration, and this has stoked significant public and media debate. Europe\u2019s reliance on technology from huge private U.S. companies has become a focal point in that debate.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Dutch are, just like many others, highly dependent on the infrastructure provided by extremely dominant tech companies, mostly from the U.S.,\u201d Zenger told TechCrunch. \u201cWhat this means, and the risks that come from this, have been nicely demonstrated in the past few weeks. As a result, the public debate in the Netherlands has been relatively sharp. Where in the past this problem was only discussed on the level of \u2018which instant messenger should I use<\/em>,\u2019 I feel now we are having the debate on higher levels as well: \u2018we should get rid of this dependency<\/em>.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n In that context, the public could be conflating dominance with data protection abuse. With companies like Meta regularly being investigated<\/a> and fined<\/a> over data privacy practices, Signal might appear the lesser evil: it\u2019s based in the U.S., but operated by a non-profit that ensures encryption of both message content and the metadata around it<\/a>.<\/p>\n Vincent B\u00f6hre<\/a>, director at Dutch privacy organization Privacy First<\/a>, also pointed to increased media coverage and a broader shift in public opinion.<\/p>\n \u201cEver since Trump was re-elected in the U.S. a few months ago, there has been a lot of \u2018bashing\u2019 of Trump and [Elon] Musk in Dutch \u2014 and European \u2014 mainstream media, including bashing of American Big Tech companies, which now seem to be supportive of Trump,\u201d B\u00f6hre told TechCrunch. \u201cArticles criticizing X [formerly Twitter] and Meta have been popping up in Dutch media everywhere, leading to a shift in Dutch public opinion: even people who never really knew or cared about privacy and security in social media, have now suddenly become interested in \u2018privacy-friendly\u2019 alternatives, Signal in particular.\u201d<\/p>\n While the Netherlands is just one market of 18 million people in a European population of more than 700 million, its surge in adoption could signal a broader trend across the continent, especially as governments seek to bring down privacy barriers.<\/p>\n Apple, for example, recently pulled end-to-end encryption<\/a> from iCloud in the U.K. to counter government efforts to install a backdoor. <\/p>\n Speaking at RightsCon 25<\/a> in Taiwan this week, Whittaker reaffirmed<\/a> Signal\u2019s unwavering stance on privacy.<\/p>\n \u201cSignal\u2019s position on this is very clear \u2013- we will not walk-back, adulterate, or otherwise perturb the robust privacy and security guarantees that people depend on,\u201d Whittaker said<\/a>. \u201cWhether that perturbation or backdoor is called client-side scanning, or the stripping of the encryption protections from one or another features similar to what Apple was pushed into doing in the U.K.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"Signal](\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Screenshot-2025-02-28-at-11.51.34.png?w=680\")
Clear signal<\/h2>\n
Signal of intent<\/h2>\n
![\"Signal](\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/GettyImages-1244488435-e1740753082662.jpg?w=680\")