\n<\/p>\n
Despite an ultimatum from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Anthropic said that it can’t “in good conscience” comply with a Pentagon edict to remove guardrails on its AI, CEO Dario Amodei wrote in a blog post<\/a>. The Department of Defense had threatened to cancel a $200 million contract and label Anthropic a “supply chain risk” if it didn’t agree to remove safeguards over mass surveillance and autonomous weapons.<\/p>\n “Our strong preference is to continue to serve the Department and our warfighters \u2014 with our two requested safeguards in place,” Amodei said. “We remain ready to continue our work to support the national security of the United States.”<\/p>\n In response, US Under Secretary of Defense Emil Michael accused Amodei in a post on X<\/a> of wanting “nothing more than to try to personally control the US military and is OK putting our nation’s safety at risk.”<\/p>\n The standoff began when the Pentagon demanded that Anthropic its Claude AI product available for “all lawful purposes” \u2014 including mass surveillance and the development of fully autonomous weapons that can kill without human supervision. Anthropic refused to offer its tech for those things, even with a “safety stack” built into that model.<\/p>\n Yesterday, Axios<\/em><\/a> reported that Hegseth gave Anthropic a deadline of 5:01 PM on Friday to agree to the Pentagon’s terms. At the same time, the DoD requested an assessment of its reliance on Claude, an initial step toward potentially labelling Anthropic as a “supply chain risk” \u2014 a designation usually reserved for firms from adversaries like China and “never before applied to an American company,” Anthropic wrote.<\/p>\n Amodei declined to change his stance and stated that if the Pentagon chose to offboard Anthropic, “we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations or other critical missions.” Grok is one of the other providers<\/a> the DoD is reportedly considering, along with Google’s Gemini and OpenAI.<\/p>\n It may not be that simple for the military to disentangle itself from Claude, however. Up until now, Anthropic’s model has been the only one allowed for the military’s most sensitive tasks in intelligence, weapons development and battlefield operations. Claude was reportedly used in the Venezuelan raid in which the US military exfiltrated the country’s president, Nicol\u00e1s Maduro, and his wife.<\/p>\n AI companies have been widely criticized for potential harm<\/a> to users, but mass surveillance and weapons development would clearly take that to a new level. Anthropic’s potential reply to the Pentagon was seen as a test of its claim to be the most safety-forward AI company, particularly after dropping<\/a> its flagship safety pledge a few days ago. Now that Amodei has responded, the focus will shift to the Pentagon to see if it follows through on its threats, which could seriously harm Anthropic.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n