\n<\/p>\n
Mark Zuckerberg took the stand Wednesday in a high-profile jury trial over social media addiction. In an appearance that was described by<\/a> NBC News<\/em> as “combative,” the Facebook founder reportedly said that Meta’s goal was to make Instagram “useful” not increase the time users are spending in the app.<\/p>\n On the stand, Zuckerberg was questioned about a company document that said improving engagement was among “company goals,” according to CNBC<\/em><\/a>. But Zuckerberg claimed that the company had “made the conscious decision to move away from those goals, focusing instead on utility,” according to The Associated Press<\/em><\/a>. “If something is valuable, people will use it more because it\u2019s useful to them,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The trial stems from a lawsuit brought by a California woman identified as “KGM” in court documents. The now 20-year-old alleges that she was harmed as a child by addictive features in Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat and TikTok. TikTok and Snap opted to settle<\/a> before the case went to trial.<\/p>\n Zuckerberg was also asked about previous public statements, including his remarks on Joe Rogan’s podcast last year that he can’t be fired<\/a> by Meta’s board because he controls a majority of the voting power. According to The New York Times<\/em><\/a>, <\/em>Zuckerberg accused the plaintiffs’ lawyer of “mischaracterizing” his past comments more than a dozen times.<\/p>\n Zuckerberg’s appearance in court also apparently prompted the judge to warn people in the courtroom not to record the proceedings using AI glasses. As CNBC<\/em> notes, members of Zuckerberg’s entourage were spotted<\/a> wearing Meta’s smart glasses as the CEO was escorted into the courthouse. It’s unclear if anyone was actually using the glasses in court, but legal affairs journalist Meghann Cuniff<\/a> reported that the judge was particularly concerned about the possibility of jurors being recorded or subjected to facial recognition. (Meta’s smart glasses do not currently have native facial recognition abilities, but recent reports suggest the company is considering<\/a> adding such features.)<\/p>\n The Los Angeles trial has been closely watched not just because it marked a rare in-court appearance for Zuckerberg. It’s among the first of several cases where Meta will face allegations that its platforms have harmed children. In this case and in a separate proceeding in New Mexico, Meta’s lawyers have cast doubt on the idea that social media should be considered a real addiction. Instagram chief Adam Mosseri previously testified<\/a> in the same Los Angeles trial that Instagram isn’t “clinically addictive.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n