Yves here. As the US is committing to yet more military escalation, not only are we stripping social safety nets but also further neglecting our already-crumbling infrastructure. Most of you have read before about the sorry, dangerous condition of US bridges due to underinvesting in maintenance. This warning about dams and levees ought to raise alarms but probably won\u2019t. Unlike a bridge falling down, floods due to dam or other water-restraining system failure is easier for politicians to treat as \u201cshit happens,\u201d since a weather event of some sort will be the trigger.<\/p>\n
We\u2019re having a lot of flooding here (not specifically where I am, where we get at most a few hours of select roads being innundated; we are in a rocky area so persistent heavy rains drain quickly into the sea), including most recently a tourist city, Hat Yai, with a regional airport being flooded out and requiring a national emergency response<\/a>. Since flooding in low-lying areas is common here, even if the frequence and severity of this year is not, I\u2019m not certain if and when recriminations about arguably preventable damage will start. Americans tend to be more vocal about property damage, but I harbor doubts in the end that there is either the will or the resources to get out in front of this looming threat.<\/p>\n By Jeff Masters. Originally published at Yale Climate Connections<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n \u201cAmerica\u2019s infrastructure is the foundation on which our national economy, global competitiveness, and quality of life depend,\u201d begins the 2025 Report Card for America\u2019s Infrastructure<\/a> from the American Society of Civil Engineers, or ASCE, a trade group.<\/p>\n The report, issued once every four years, gave America\u2019s infrastructure an overall grade of C, up from a C- grade in its 2021 report. ASCE credited the improvement to the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law of 2021, plus federal partnerships with state and local governments and the private sector.<\/p>\n But dams, levees, stormwater, and wastewater infrastructure components received D to D+ grades. That\u2019s concerning given that climate change is increasingly stressing dams, levees, wastewater, and stormwater systems through heavier precipitation events. What\u2019s more, the federal government has shown little interest in sustaining the funding needed to continue improving infrastructure.<\/p>\n A \u201cD\u201d grade, in ASCE\u2019s words, means \u201cthe infrastructure is in fair to poor condition and mostly below standard, with many elements approaching the end of their service life. A large portion of the system exhibits significant deterioration. Condition and capacity are of serious concern with strong risk of failure.\u201d Each of ASCE\u2019s assessments since the first was issued in 1998 has given U.S. dams a \u201cD\u201d or \u201cD+\u201d grade.<\/p>\n ASCE called for investments of over $165 billion for dams, more than $70 billion for levees, and by 2044, $690 billion for wastewater and stormwater systems. That adds up to about $1 trillion.<\/p>\n Climate Change Is Increasing the Risks to Water-Related Infrastructure<\/strong><\/p>\n Increased precipitation in the U.S. in recent decades, partially the result of climate change, has caused an additional $2.5 billion a year in U.S. flood damages, according to a\u00a0January 2021 study\u00a0in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The researchers, climate scientists at Stanford University, found that between 1988 and 2017, heavier precipitation accounted for more than one-third of the damage.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is real economic value in avoiding higher levels of global warming,\u201d study co-author Noah Diffenbaugh said in an interview with E&E News. \u201cThat\u2019s not a political statement. That\u2019s a factual statement about costs. And it also shows that there\u2019s real economic value to adaptation and resilience because we\u2019re clearly not adapted to the climate change that\u2019s already happened.\u201d<\/p>\n Aging infrastructure and more frequent and intense rainstorms cause additional strain to the nation\u2019s dams. Since 2018, heavy rains have resulted in approximately 30 dam failures or near failures just in the Midwest, according to ASCE. Some examples:<\/p>\n Minnesota, June 2024:<\/strong> The 115-year-old Rapidan Dam, which had gone through several rounds of repairs since 2002 and was assessed to be in poor condition in 2023, failed. The failure resulted in the destruction of a power station and destroyed part of a riverbank.<\/p>\n Michigan, May 2020:<\/strong> Heavy rains from a 1-in-200-year rainstorm destroyed two 96-year-old dams, the Edenville Dam and Sanford Dam, and damaged four other dams, causing $250 million in damage.<\/p>\n U.S. Dams Need Over $165 Billion in Upgrades<\/strong><\/p>\n Drawing upon the latest data from the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, ASCE estimated the cost of rehabilitating all non-federal U.S. dams (which comprise 96% of the country\u2019s more than 92,000 dams) at $165 billion. Of that amount, $37 billion is needed to address high-hazard dams, defined as those whose failure would result in loss of life and significant property damage. Additional money, which was not quantified in the report, would be needed to upgrade federal dams.<\/p>\n Over 2,500 dams are considered \u201chigh-hazard.\u201d This class of dams has increased by 20% in number since 2012, driven mostly by increased development in downstream areas.<\/p>\n The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers says<\/a> the dams it maintains are designed to serve for 50 years. Yet the average age of America\u2019s dams is 64 years, and over 70% of U.S. dams are more than 50 years old. Old dams are a hazard: Approximately 75% of all U.S. dam failures occurred in dams over 50 years old.<\/p>\n A key problem for old dams is that their reservoirs gradually fill up with sediment as they age, reducing their storage capacity and increasing the risk that the dams will overtop and fail. This problem is exacerbated by climate change, because increased drought and wildfire in the surrounding watershed increase the amount of debris flowing into reservoirs during heavy rains.\u00a0In addition, dams built for flood-control purposes for the climate of the 20th century may no longer be up to the task for the warming climate of the 21st\u00a0century, when heavier downpours can be expected to put pressure on infrastructure not designed for such extreme flows.<\/p>\n Worse Than Most: Vermont\u2019s Dams<\/strong><\/p>\n In Vermont, the average age of the state\u2019s dams is 89 years, and many were not built using modern codes and standards. In other words, they are not designed to withstand increasingly heavy and frequent rainstorms. Following historic flooding in July 2023, state dam inspectors found that 57 dams were overtopped by flooding, 50 dams sustained \u201cnotable damage,\u201d and five dams failed.<\/p>\n U.S. Levees Need Significantly More than $70 Billion in Upgrades<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cTwenty-three million Americans nationwide live and work behind a levee,\u201d the report notes. \u201cThe National Levee Database contains over 24,000 miles of levees across the U.S., but nearly two-thirds have not been assessed for risks posed to the communities behind them.\u201d<\/p>\n In that context, the Civil Engineers\u2019 2025 report card grade of D+ for the nation\u2019s 40,000 miles of levees is concerning. The ASCE said that the cost of bringing the nation\u2019s levees into a state of good repair was significantly more than the $70 billion it estimated in 2021.<\/p>\n U.S. levees are, on average, 61 years old, many built using engineering standards less rigorous than current best practices. The good news is that fewer than 3% of U.S. levees are rated high or very high risk, down from 4% in 2021.<\/p>\n Wastewater and Stormwater Systems Are 70% Underfunded<\/b><\/p>\n \u201cThe nation\u2019s sewers are estimated to be worth over $1 trillion and include nearly 17,500 In 2024, the wastewater and stormwater annual capital needs were $99 billion, but funding was just 30% of that \u2013 $30 billion per year. The report said, \u201cAssuming the combined wastewater and stormwater sector continues along the same path, the gap will grow to more than $690 billion by 2044.\u201d<\/p>\n The report\u2019s D and D+ grades for stormwater and wastewater infrastructure, respectively, were unchanged from the 2021 report, despite the injection of $46 billion allocated by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act in 2021 and 2022 to assist the stormwater, wastewater, and drinking water sectors.<\/p>\n Smart Infrastructure Spending Is Essential<\/strong><\/p>\n Although massive investments in our infrastructure are essential, the money must be spent wisely. Many infrastructure upgrades don\u2019t account for future climate extremes. As sea level rise expert\u00a0Robert Young<\/a>\u00a0of Coastal Carolina University wrote in a 2022 New York Times op-ed, \u201cmost of the funded projects are designed to protect existing infrastructure, in most cases with no demands for the recipients to improve long-term planning for disasters or to change patterns of future flood plain development. At the very least, we need to demand that communities accepting public funds for rebuilding or resilience stop putting new infrastructure in harm\u2019s way.\u201d<\/p>\n Some of the projects funded in the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law<\/a> were of questionable wisdom. For example, it allocated funds to elevate 19 single-family homes in the Florida Keys.\u00a0I love the Keys, but cruel math says that it is not cost-effective to defend the low-lying islands, which are all but certain to be swamped by rising seas in the coming decades. A state-commissioned 2020 report<\/a> by the Urban Land Institute found that spending about $8 billion to combat sea level rise and storm surges in the Keys would only prevent about $3 billion in damages over the period 2020-2070 \u2014 a return of just 41 cents on each dollar spent. In contrast, the study found that in Miami, a similar investment would yield a return of over $9 for each dollar spent.<\/p>\n And civil engineer Chuck Marohn, founder of the nonprofit strongtowns.org<\/a>, argues that infrastructure spending encouraging sprawl is to be avoided<\/a>, since \u201cwhen you sprawl outward, every new house adds more to the public obligation to maintain. More pipes, more roads, more services. But there\u2019s no corresponding bump in tax productivity. Instead, you create what we call a \u201cbad party<\/a>\u201d \u2014 a place where every new resident consumes more than they contribute.\u201d<\/p>\n Bob Henson contributed to this post.<\/em><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nakedcapitalism.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00-dam.webp\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nakedcapitalism.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00-dam2.webp\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nakedcapitalism.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00-dam3.webp\")
<\/p>\n
wastewater treatment plants that operate to protect public health and ensure the well-being of communities,\u201d the report said.<\/p>\n
![\"Print](\"https:\/\/cdn.printfriendly.com\/buttons\/print-button-gray.png\")
<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n