\u201cThe government failed to disclose that Co-Conspirator 1, the central figure in this supposed scheme has a decades-long history of fraud and has been repeatedly found liable for fraud in lawsuits,\u201d the filing reads. \u201cThe affidavit did not reveal that Co-Conspirator 1 has repeatedly falsely accused business partners of crimes and other wrongdoings in efforts to escape liability for his own actions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Duong\u2019s attorneys are asking a federal judge to hold a hearing where they can question the FBI agent who wrote the nearly 80-page sealed affidavit.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe government built its case against David Duong almost entirely on allegations from a known fraudster with a grudge against the Duong family,\u201d Duong\u2019s attorneys said in a statement to KQED Saturday.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe government violated Mr. Duong\u2019s constitutional rights when it failed to disclose its cooperator\u2019s full background and false statements in the warrant applications.\u201dA spokesperson for the FBI\u2019s San Francisco field office did not respond to a request for comment Saturday afternoon.<\/p>\n Evolutionary Homes is no longer in business, but David Duong remains CEO of California Waste Solutions, Oakland\u2019s curbside recycling provider. His attorneys are also seeking to exclude some evidence obtained from David Duong\u2019s cell phone provider through an earlier warrant.<\/p>\n According to David Duong\u2019s lawyers, the June 2024 affidavit says that agents came across information about the alleged scheme while investigating Juarez\u2019s suspected defrauding of an Oakland print shop he hired to produce and mail the campaign mailers. According to Duong\u2019s lawyers, who viewed the sealed affidavit, it also shows that federal investigators alleged a shooting in front of Juarez\u2019s house last year may have been an attempt by the Duongs to murder Juarez in retaliation for cooperating with law enforcement.<\/p>\n \u201cBased on my training and experience, and knowledge of the investigation,\u201d an FBI agent wrote, according to Duong\u2019s filing, \u201cgiven that the shooter or shooters were waiting at [Co-Conspirator 1] home, and the shooting occurred three days after [Co-Conspirator 1] spoke with FBI agents, I believe that the shooting was targeted and may have been coordinated by the Duong family in an attempt to kill or harm [Co-Conspirator 1] to prevent him from cooperating with the investigation.\u201d<\/p>\n Attorneys for Duong say that allegation was based on Juarez\u2019s \u201clies to law enforcement\u201d about what happened the night of the shooting. On the contrary, they allege, evidence shows Juarez initiated the shooting himself.<\/p>\n \u201cEvidence that was available to the agent but was omitted from the affidavit shows the shooting had nothing to do with David Duong and his family,\u201d the filing reads.<\/p>\n After the shooting, law enforcement provided funds to Juarez for relocation, according to the document.<\/p>\n The affidavit indicates Juarez likely cooperated in the case in the hopes of obtaining leniency, according to Duong\u2019s attorneys, and that he \u201cappears to be motivated by revenge against the Duongs and a desire to obtain protection from law enforcement from the Duongs.\u201d<\/p>\n While the affidavit notes that Juarez has been charged with theft-related crimes, it says there were no convictions. Other details of Juarez\u2019s history \u2014 including prior arrests for theft, embezzlement, battery, battery of a spouse and inflicting injury on a spouse or child \u2014 were not mentioned, the attorneys wrote.<\/p>\n \u201cThe affidavit does not disclose readily available, public information that Co-Conspirator 1 has a decades-long track record of defrauding business partners, like David Duong, including situations where Co-Conspirator 1 accused his creditors of crimes to try to prevent them from being able to recoup debts he owed,\u201d the filing reads.<\/p>\n Public records show Juarez has been sued about 33 times between 1992 and 2022, including numerous fraud cases involving former business partners, according to the filing.<\/p>\n \u201cJuarez\u2019s claims are rendered fundamentally unreliable by his history of fraud, lies and attacking his former business partners,\u201d Duongs\u2019 attorneys wrote. \u201cThe failure to disclose this history was reckless at best.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2017\/11\/RS27957_IMG_8020-qut.jpg\")
The Alameda District Attorney\u2019s Office last year charged Juarez with passing bad checks in connection to the mailers, but the case was later dismissed.<\/p>\n